![]() The February earthquake occurred during lunchtime on a weekday when the CBD was busy, and many buildings were already weakened from the previous quakes. The epicentre was closer to Christchurch, and shallower at 5 kilometres (3 mi) underground, whereas the September quake was measured at 10 kilometres (6 mi) deep. Results of liquefaction the fine washed-up sand solidifies after the water has run offĪlthough smaller in magnitude than the 2010 earthquake, the February earthquake was more damaging and deadly for a number of reasons. ![]() Adjusted for inflation, the earthquake caused over NZD$77 billion in damage, making it New Zealand’s costliest natural disaster and the 21st-most-expensive disaster in history. ![]() Subsequent population loss saw the Christchurch main urban area fall behind the Wellington equivalent, to decrease from second- to third-most populous area in New Zealand. While the initial quake only lasted for approximately 10 seconds, the damage was severe because of the location and shallowness of the earthquake's focus in relation to Christchurch as well as previous quake damage. The earthquake was felt across the South Island and parts of the lower and central North Island. Significant liquefaction affected the eastern suburbs, producing around 400,000 tonnes of silt. It caused widespread damage across Christchurch, killing 185 people, in New Zealand's fifth-deadliest disaster.Ĭhristchurch's central city and eastern suburbs were badly affected, with damage to buildings and infrastructure already weakened by the magnitude 7.1 Canterbury earthquake of 4 September 2010 and its aftershocks. The M w6.2 ( M L6.3) earthquake struck the entire of the Canterbury region in the South Island, centred 6.7 kilometres (4.2 mi) south-east of the central business district. Port Hills near Christchurch, Canterbury, New Zealandģ.5 m (11 ft) tsunami waves in the Tasman Lake, following quake-triggered glacier calving from Tasman Glacier Ī major earthquake occurred in Christchurch on Tuesday 22 February 2011 at 12:51 p.m. It seeks to provide a sense of the experiences and the potential meanings that were derived from being part of this 'moment in time'.Įxamples of innovations in practice emerged during the earthquake response and a number of recommendations for nursing practice are identified. This paper presents an overview of the earthquakes and experiences of nurses working during this time, identifying a range of issues that will benefit from further exploration and research. However, little is known regarding the impact of this, either in personal or professional terms. Nurses played a significant role in the response to the earthquakes and its aftermath. The establishment of an injury database allowed for an accurate picture to emerge of the injury burden, and each of the authors was present and worked in a clinical capacity during the earthquake. SOURCES OF EVIDENCE: This paper developed following interviews with nurses who worked during this period, and draws on literature related to healthcare responses to earthquakes and natural disasters. Staff working in the only emergency department in the city were faced with an external emergency while also being directly affected as part of the disaster. While the highest magnitude quake occurred in September 2010, registering 7.1 on the Richter scale, it was the magnitude 6.3 event on 22 February 2011 which was associated with the greatest injury burden and loss of life. The location of these, around and within the major city of Christchurch, was unexpected and associated with previously unknown fault lines. NZ has experienced earthquakes and aftershocks centred in the Canterbury region of the South Island. To outline the impact of the Canterbury, New Zealand (NZ) earthquakes on Christchurch Hospital, and the experiences of emergency nurses during this time.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |